On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tyler Retzlaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5/22/2015 6:21 AM, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Tyler Retzlaff <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> hi, >>> >>> just soliciting opinions for removal of NATM (sys/netnatm). >>> >>> it has been bitrotting away for what looks like years, never >>> gets compiled (not even by ALL kernels) and given its condition >>> I doubt it is used by anyone anywhere. >>> >>> is there a process to be followed for removing it? is there a >>> reason to keep it around? >> >> >> No objection means ok to remove? :) >> > > here's the patch to remove netnatm and en(4). let me know if I missed > anything otherwise I'll commit soon.
I guess you also need to remove if_atm* and opt_natm.h stuffs. ozaki-r
