-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07.09.2015 10:47, Stephan wrote: > Wasn´t this the same as with RPATH and the name cache? > > 2015-09-07 9:23 GMT+02:00 Martin Husemann <mar...@duskware.de>: >> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 03:50:21AM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski >> wrote: >>> + error = vnode_to_path(path, MAXPATHLEN,vp, l, p); >> >> Two nits: >> >> 1) vnode_to_path(9) is undocumented 2) it only works if you are >> lucky (IIUC) - which you mostly are >> >> The former is easy to fix, the latter IMHO is a killer before we >> expose this interface prominently and make debuggers depend on >> it.
I'm here to get the support for it. At the moment it (cache nits) exceeds my comprehension too. Are the other bits ok? KAUTH usage, colonization kern_resource.c etc. >> We then should also make $ORIGIN work in ld.elf_so ;-} >> It's scheduled. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV7WX4AAoJEEuzCOmwLnZso8YQAJerKuqnQ0rSgVtytEdxwmTK mgZAZVQk40BTvoCU5ytD1ze3tbtbgvX9E7IQXgTHGLEXQE58EbNNWXH9Ou63OgvF 8xdsGCZqM137XbNwbQfktSJHdRsug2Gx8ph+8eUKEbnvzd7doCpOKCjhWeVmRI1S uUC7YVUCJ2BzvuQrOvmtujpCULBFGz+2QpXC3POtEMfNc76t6SJ+Hizb3hMxDk93 4B6ByCv0KgG6PIVU7WwXwNz768KofDvfbYf/vA0V1hqAoXnr+I2bSTO5z6ct53NY UAO5YtQLTSx5jCSbeAcGUKzo0CIG+bI67yVwx7+EoEALwBu0azMLSzb4+le02ZPP 2VX6oZXqMJHXy1YHUdaMo6IPIuGaEOmsyTaNXnOX+yEZgMfLjqp1u82mWR5JXsgt axZ+Ze10rasqK+Drv0bj317TX24OyA5vPORA3co6sKl5f8DpxE5uB9aQLULttfm9 S/B4JF4NAx4ttQYw+g0IFPR0yj0vLoxhCgY76NEj9J6rci4rfX0JudJVHjJmW4ZA eDL8ZrW14trldeqYgKgdxsLmaa+ZnRSo4bFTqWi+wiCqMKbQNp+5xAgJRTRS12DN kET0UfK2MnUGErMTzeQQHfZa22d+3WPZjW8U7KDnVc2v5sIhQT4hh+80CqZWZ1Ld cSFuv9thoY1ACc5wtPKG =mvY+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
