On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:00:06AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote: > Perhaps we should just explain that it is not the responsibility of the > caller to check for the result of kmem_alloc() in the KM_WAIT case, and > centralize the check in kmem_alloc() to make it panic() if it would > return NULL? Is that better than fixing the 400+ calling sites?
Exactly. It is much better. Joerg
