On 05/04/2016 03:16, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >> Previous to the change you've proposed, 'route show' provided a more >> comprehensive view of the routing state. Now, it is missing several >> useful items. Where has the 10.0.1.1 route gone? Where are the >> MAC addresses? Previously, you could issue one command and within >> an eyespan have all of the information that you needed to diagnose >> connectivity problems on routers. Now, to first appearances, every >> routing state looks suspect, and it's necessary to dig in with arp/ndp >> to see if things are ok. > > I think we can restore dropped information to route show output, but I'm > not sure whether they should be there while they're not L3 routes and we > can get them from arp/ndp commands easily. For the PoV of backward > compatibility, we should do so though...
Can we at least have an option not to show them? I quite enjoy the route output actually showing configured routes only. Roy
