On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 08:21:17PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote: > > I expressed already my concerns about having a single cut-over point, at > which all drivers need to change simultaneously. I'd much rather see a > mechanism to support old and new approaches, so drivers can be converted in > a more leisurely fashion.
Since msaitoh@ has volunteered to do all the work, I believe a "single cut-over point" is in this case preferable. Get it done while we can, have less conditional code in the tree. That's my take on it. Thor
