On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 06:30:23PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote: > Or enclose with #ifdef DIAGNOSTIC?
Assuming we do not use aprint_error when there is no "error", hiding it for non-DIAGNOSTIC kernels does not make sense to me (at least in the !silent or !quiet case). I wonder if we should make the error count available via a read-only sysctl, so userland could act on it later (especially in quiet or silent boots). Martin
