> On Aug 12, 2016, at 3:24 PM, Jaromír Doleček <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> ...
> We do have crc32 support in libkern, so I was thinking doing something along
> that.
> ...
> What is general option, is there any interest to have crc32c support
> consolidated into a lib, should I put some efford into making this shared
> code? It adds some kernel bloat, so I'm slightly reluctant.
It seems sensible. It could be done by a common CRC routine that takes a table
pointer argument, then the two specific routines are just wrappers.
paul
