On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:48:32PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >> Note that it of course consumes more CPU time for softint >> and more memory for m_dup. That said, I think that this is >> a suitable workaround for now until someone makes them >> softint-based. > > Could you provide some TODO like document (e.g. on the wiki) where > the poor soul wading into ISDN drivers (i.e.) could find out what > exactly needs to be done to the drivers? (Even if this is just two > or three sentences, it should be spelled out explicitly.)
I added doc/TODO.smpnet for it. It will include TODOs of MP-safe network stack. Updated the patch: http://www.netbsd.org/~ozaki-r/bpf_mtap_softint.diff > > Did I understand correctly that you will add the defered mtap to all > drivers for now, and after the driver has been fixed it will return to > old bpf_mtap? Yes. > So if we ask nxr for users of the defered tap and find none, > we know that the task is done? Yes, we can know it by searching bpf_mtap_softint. ozaki-r
