On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:50:58PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 21.03.2017 13:43, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:38:09PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > >> I planned to spend my time on kqueue(2)/kevent(2) and aio(3) after May > >> (full-time effort, but not GSoC). There is a list of bug reports around > >> these calls and few missing features (I need SIGEV_KEVENT). > > > > The point of the project is not to implement aio on top of kqueue, but > > to provide a real kernel implementation. > > > > Joerg > > > > This part is clear, kevent(2)/kqueue(2) and aio(3) are two diverse > projects. Just that there is an option that I will focus entirely on the > former and Raunaq on the latter during GSoC (and his master thesis). > While Runaq does not need to care about kevent(2)/kqueue(2) improvements > I can stop caring about implementing real aio(2) myself.
OK, that's not how I read your mail :) Joerg
