On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:17:18AM +0200, Jarom??r Dole??ek wrote: > 2017-03-12 11:15 GMT+01:00 Edgar Fu?? <e...@math.uni-bonn.de>: > > Some comments as I probably count as one of the larger WAPBL consumers (we > > have ~150 employee's Home and Mail on NFS on FFS2+WAPBL on RAIDframe on > > SAS): > > I've not changed the code in RF to pass the cache flags, so the patch > doesn't actually enable FUA there. Mainly because disks come and go > and I'm not aware of mechanism to make WAPBL aware of such changes. It
I ran into this issue with tls-maxphys and got so frustrated I was actually considering simply panicing if a less-capable disk were used to replace a more-capable one. Just FYI. Thor
