On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 12:54:52PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > I wonder if it would make sense for nanosleep(2) to check that requested > > sleeping time is shorter than a schedule slice, and if it is, spin the > > CPU instead of scheduling another process. Any opinion on this? > > No, that's wrong. It's also been discussed before.
How is that wrong? It was always more or less the point of nanosleep. -- David A. Holland [email protected]
