>> I don't think so, directory ops all happen at the upper level (or >> nowhere). > (it is also not what we currently do, [...])
No, it's not. But it's pretty close to, and I think that it actually was intended to mean "_modifying_ directory ops", ie, those which show EROFS when attempted on a read-only filesystem; in that case, I think it's true. Though, of course, if you don't care about the current semantics.... /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B