> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:09:06 +0200 > From: Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 03:18:44PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote: > > On reflection, this patch has the downside of always reserving 4 MB of > > RAM up front, which the original exec_map approach did not. Attached > > is another patch that reintroduces exec_map (but in MI code, not a > > copy of it in all MD code) and pool-allocates from that, without a > > low-water mark. Compile-tested only so far. > > I ran an anita test for Xen/amd64 and Xen/i386 with your patch and didn't > notice any bad effect. please commit !
Thanks! Now let's hope it withstands the long uptimes under load that my 32-bit NetBSD >=5 systems never did.
