On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 02:48:11AM -0600, Dave Huang wrote: > On Jan 4, 2018, at 15:22, Phil Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > > How about turning on the workaround for any process that ignores > > or catches SEGV. Any process that is terminated by a SEGV should > > be safe, shouldn't it? > > Isn't there a suggested mitigation? Seems to me NetBSD should implement > it as suggested, rather than coming up with its own special criteria > for when to enable the workaround.
BTW: latest summary below: https://security.googleblog.com/2018/01/more-details-about-mitigations-for-cpu_4.html https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/05/spectre_flaws_explained/ Regards, -- Piotr 'aniou' Meyer
