On 11.03.2018 18:23, Robert Elz wrote:
>     Date:        Sun, 11 Mar 2018 16:02:57 +0100
>     From:        Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com>
>     Message-ID:  <10b0efe2-35bb-d1e8-ed28-587f643bd...@gmx.com>
>   | We already use markers so I prefer to stick to this solution and it
>   | makes this code reliable.
> Actually, since I sent the previous message, I have been thinking on it
> more, and I don't think that it does.
> It handles the case where we have found a process on allproc, and it is
> (while we are scanning more of allproc) moved to zombproc, so we won't
> get the process twice.

That was the original design.

I will have a look at the approach with iterating over pid_table[].

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to