On 11.03.2018 18:23, Robert Elz wrote: > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 16:02:57 +0100 > From: Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> > Message-ID: <10b0efe2-35bb-d1e8-ed28-587f643bd...@gmx.com> > > | We already use markers so I prefer to stick to this solution and it > | makes this code reliable. > > Actually, since I sent the previous message, I have been thinking on it > more, and I don't think that it does. > > It handles the case where we have found a process on allproc, and it is > (while we are scanning more of allproc) moved to zombproc, so we won't > get the process twice. >
That was the original design. I will have a look at the approach with iterating over pid_table.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature