In article <ab8d9957-74a5-e162-3637-6dc788eb8...@m00nbsd.net>, Maxime Villard <m...@m00nbsd.net> wrote: >Le 20/11/2018 à 16:18, Greg Troxel a écrit : >> I used to use it, and may again. So I'd like to see it stay, partly >> because I think it's good to keep NetBS relevant in the fileystem >> research world. I am expecting to see new upstream activity. > >The problem is that CODA is not relevant in this world either... Developed >since 1987, hasn't gone very far, seems to have been dropped by everybody >except us and Linux. There appears to be some activity in the Linux source >from time to time, but nothing really significant at a first glance. Our >code, on the other side, hasn't moved at all. > >The research world of today is much more around ZFS and HammerFS, neither >of which we support correctly. Keeping dead wood of the previous century for >the sake of "research" is really bad IMHO.
But CODA is a remote filesystem, not a local filesystem. christos