> The full release build is a number of substeps. It makes sense to > use -k for the main build of the system, after the tools build, to > get the "find all problems" property you want. But it's not clear to > me that it makes sense to build the main system if the tool build > fails.
In make(1) terminology, this means that the entire main system build should depend on the tools build. If make(1) is not used for that ordering, whatever tool is used should implement -k semantics itself as aoppropriate, seems to me. > And it's not clear that sets should be produced. Similarly, sets should depend on the main build. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B