On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:27:04PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 08:46:33PM +0100, Micha? G?rny wrote: > > While researching libc++ test failures, I've discovered that NetBSD > > suffers from the same issue as FreeBSD -- that is, both the userspace > > tooling and the kernel have problems with (time_t)-1 timestamp, > > i.e. one second before the epoch. > > I see no reason why that should be valid or more general, why any > negative value of time_t is required to be valid.
Are you Dan Pop? :-) -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
