> On Jan 30, 2019, at 3:29 PM, Robert Elz <[email protected]> wrote: > > | Yes, I think something like: > | > | size_t mbuf_cluster_size_for_size(size_t desired_size); > > whatever the name, is unlikely to be needed, that would be > used in the "must specify a supportyed size" variant of the > former, rather than the "pick a supported size that will handle > the request" version that you thought was better (as do I.)
I suppose you're right ... I was thinking that there might be some utility to exposing the information, in the event that it could be useful for some drivers. I could certainly be left out for now, and exposed at a later time if there was a concrete use for it. -- thorpej
