On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 01:21:27PM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote: > Are you saying that NPF is not being updated or supported? > Should we maybe remove it? > Having broken code around for 8 years without anyone even much noticing > (except you maybe) or fixing it would suggest the code is rather rotten, and > little used. > > Only half a :-) intended.
Do you think that there is any equality between remote-triggered crash and lack of specific feature? BTW: you joke makes strong argument against PF - there wasn't push for updating NPF features because they already works in - as we NOW know - buggy and insecure PF. PS. Looks like Open, with larger userbase hasn't similar objections before pruning cumbersome code. -- Piotr 'aniou' Meyer
