Thor Lancelot Simon <t...@panix.com> wrote: > I've never been a fan of the wedge: syntax (as was noted at the time, it > conflicts with the syntax for specifying network filesystem servers, > which actually broke automation I had in place); I would not mind seeing > it go.
IMO, both wedge: and NAME= are ugly, but beside your point I would be in favor of NAME= because that is what I used in x86 bootloaders, and lazyness commands not to redo it. :-) When you talk about letting it go, you means removing it, or just keeping it as is undocumented? Removing could break some setups badly. About documentation, wedge: is present in share/man/man8/man8.x86/boot.8 share/man/man9/cpu_rootconf.9 sys/arch/evbarm/conf/IYONIX sys/arch/evbarm/fdt/fdt_machdep.c sys/arch/iyonix/conf/GENERIC usr.bin/config/config.5 I suspect the wedge: references there could now just be replaced by NAME= after src/sys/kern/kern_subr.c 1.226-1.227 was committed. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org