Erik Fair <f...@netbsd.org> wrote:
> 
> I think it’d be better to call this a co-processor API (or something else
> along these lines less specific than “FPU”), and type the co-processor
> and its required, additional context for generality - just to look ahead
> a little bit.
> 

FYI: https://man.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/man-cgi?pcu++NetBSD-current

-- 
Mindaugas

Reply via email to