> On Aug 25, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Robert Swindells <r...@fdy2.co.uk> wrote: > >> The fix is non-trivial, and requires a fundamental change to how futexes >> work. > > That seemed clear in the bug, I guessed it would mean switching to using > a futex_syncobj (or similar).
Yes, and using sleepq directly. > I'm mainly interested in Linux Java, it seemed fairly easy to find > test cases that got stuck. > > Happy to do some work on simplifying the patch, or just identifying > good test cases, if it will help. Ok, I will make a point of getting this back on track by this weekend. -- thorpej
