> By the way, I'm not so familiar to sparc. > audioamd(4) has many assembly code (though they look very old stuff). > Is there any (historical or traditional) reason why I should not > remove these?
i would just ignore it. it's currently unused and if someone wants to fix it up, it's sitting there easy to look at, but it is not currently used and is known needing work for years ago API changes, so don't feel you can't change the code around it. it's just more work for someone who may eventually revive it. .mrg.