> On Apr 6, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Martin Husemann <mar...@duskware.de> wrote: > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:54:51AM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote: >> Except.... it seems to be useless in practice without an initial seed, > > Yes. > >> And the stock implementation has no possibility of ever providing an >> initial seed at all on its own (unlike previous implementations, and of >> course unlike what my patch _affords_). > > Isn't it as simple as: > > dd bs=32 if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/random > > ? That runs the risk of people thinking it adds entropy. I'd be more comfortable with this: dd bs=32 if=/dev/zero of=/dev/random because it makes the security implications more obvious. paul
- Re: regarding the changes to kernel entro... Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: regarding the changes to kernel e... Greg A. Woods
- Re: regarding the changes to kernel entro... Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: regarding the changes to kernel e... Greg A. Woods
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Greg Troxel
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Taylor R Campbell
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Greg Troxel
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Greg A. Woods
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Martin Husemann
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Koning, Paul
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Martin Husemann
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Greg A. Woods
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Martin Husemann
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Greg A. Woods
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Martin Husemann
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Greg A. Woods
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Koning, Paul
- Re: regarding the changes to ker... Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: regarding the changes to kernel entropy gathering Taylor R Campbell
- Re: regarding the changes to kernel entropy gathe... Thor Lancelot Simon