> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 02:26:04 +0000 > From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> > > Here is acpidrump -dt: https://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/acpidump
This looks like it's `acpidump -t', not `acpidump -dt'? I looked at the Linux logic, and it appears that in Linux, there is a nominally bus-independent regulator API which...only does things for FDT, and just returns dummy regulators that always succeed on ACPI. Not clear to me this is actually better than #ifdef FDT in any meaningful way. In any case, you can just use #ifdef FDT around the regulator goop for now and we can deal with it another way later.
