>> Technically the wscons terminal type is wsvt25, an extended ANSI >> compatible terminal, already supporting more sequences than vt100.
Well, it calls itself "vt100".... >> Having it also support a useful subset of xterm [...] seems like a >> useful addition, > 100% agree. Oh, certainly. It just seems to me that the name "vt100" for that emulation type is becoming more and more misleading. I have nothing at all against adding the sequences in question, except the mismatch between the implications of the name and the actual emulation (and even that is relatively weak, given how many "vt100" emulations are at least as far from VT-100s as wscons is). /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B