> On Jul 11, 2023, at 3:17 AM, Taylor R Campbell <riastr...@netbsd.org> wrote: > > If we used `struct bus_dma_tag *' instead, the forward declaration > could be `struct bus_dma_tag;' instead of having to pull in all of > sys/bus.h, _and_ the C compiler would actually check types.
In the original design, it’s not always a struct. That was the whole point of using a more abstract type. If you want to hide the struct'ness in a machdep header file, fine, but I completely disagree with the notion of requiring the use of the “struct” keyword all over the place. -- thorpej
