Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org> writes: > I'm not sure what you call "bad/odd RTC behavior". Here we're just > reading a byte of the sram, its value can be anything from 0 to 0xff. > This value is supposed to be written by the BIOS. > > I think, from our current definition of NVRAM_DIAG_BITS, that some bits > are not supposed to be set to 1, but I'm not sure if our NVRAM_DIAG_BITS > is up to date. > > Are you suggecting that we should find another way to detect if the > mc146818 is present ? AFAIK it's the other way round: unless we know it's > not present (because e.g. we're in an environnement known to not have > it like some hypervisors or emulators) we have to assume it's present > (because it's a mandatory part of the hardware).
I am suggesting that if the code is going to decide the RTC is bad because of a timeout or a bad value, and not use it, then that shouldn't have anything to do with 'are we a vm'. That's all.