On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:47:43AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > I think that NetBSD should document an unmaintained repo as upstream, > because it suggests that every change to our tree should be filed as a > PR upstream. That doesn't seem like a good use of time, adding friction > without benefit. Looking at upstream, I see very little origining > outside of NetBSD since about 2020.
I guess you meant "I think that NetBSD should *not* document an unmaintained repo as upstream." I guess you proposal makes some sense. Personally, I don't care much either way. I think we should sync our sources from the upstream version to pick up the changes that aren't in-tree and continue from there. With the git export, pulling out changes and submitting them upstream is not difficult. --chris
