But I think I’m drifting away partially after kre@ explanation.

> On 6 Jun 2025, at 12:22 PM, Jason Thorpe <thor...@me.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 5, 2025, at 11:58 PM, Emmanuel Nyarko <emmankoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> So what I want to get clear is that, if the root accepts a connection and 
>> gives that new(connect) socket to a less-privileged process, is it desirable 
>> that the new socket, given to the less-privileged process, still maintain a 
>> root so_cred? Even if I don’t do it as default and make it opt-in as we’ve 
>> agreed, do you consider the change a plausible one ?
> 
> Yes, I think that is perfectly reasonable.  But since it is a major 
> behavioral change that could break existing software, the behavior should be 
> opt-in.
> 
> -- thorpej
> 

A scoffer seeks wisdom in vain, but knowledge is easy for a man of 
understanding.
Emmanuel





Reply via email to