On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 22:42:19 +0300, [email protected] wrote: > Could someone please explain how the NetBSD build system and linker > handle symbol overriding for alternative schedulers? How does > sched_m2.c avoid multiple definition conflicts with kern_runq.c, and > what is the proper way to hook a custom scheduler into the kernel to > avoid this collision?
Read up on config(5). Schedulers are not dynamically pluggable, so you need to select which one you are compiling in. If you look at the history of sys/conf/files you can see: revision 1.868 date: 2007-10-09 23:00:13 +0400; author: rmind; state: Exp; lines: +3 -1; Import of SCHED_M2 - the implementation of new scheduler, which is based on the original approach of SVR4 with some inspirations about balancing and migration from Solaris. It implements per-CPU runqueues, provides a real-time (RT) and time-sharing (TS) queues, ready to support a POSIX real-time extensions, and also prepared for the support of CPU affinity. The following lines in the kernel config enables the SCHED_M2: no options SCHED_4BSD options SCHED_M2 The scheduler seems to be stable. Further work will come soon. You need to do similar song and dance to get your scheduler compiled into the kernel instead of the default 4BSD or M2. -uwe
