Sure, I can do it. To make it clear, besides this list, you want another list that failed the test because of it is not used in a standard way or compiler settings?
2016-05-09 7:27 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <chris...@astron.com>: > In article > <ca+sxe9ucresoz3cbo0qzxuuh7vae32ezkvsgbe7427owxds...@mail.gmail.com>, > Charles Cui <charles.cui1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>Thanks guys for all your advices! I will try the methods proposed by >>you guys and let you know once I have new results. >>Right now, my way (install kernel and userland together) works (It >>takes kernel and libc updates and generate expected results.) This is >>the updated list (much shorter than before) that I need to contribute >>to. I have make an annotation for each feature. (freebsd) means >>freebsd implements it, but we did not. (linux) means freebsd and >>netbsd do not implement, but linux implements. > > Looks good. I would create either 2 lists or a table with 3 columns. > These I presume are the failed to compile tests because of the missing > features. It would be good to also have the failed to run tests (the > ones where the feature is implemented but does not behave as the standards > mandate). Can you please compile that too? > > Thanks, > > christos >
