Yes, I can do 2 and 5, and fix 3. I am now in the progress of porting ad's patch, let's complete it. Once I have verified the porting part is done (compile new kernel , run benchmarks, see errors does not exist), I will return to complete 2, 5 and fix 3, sounds good? Of course, I will send you guys the patch of the porting work shortly.
2016-05-26 15:02 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com>: > On May 26, 2:08pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: pthread library related > > 1. SIGRTMIN/SIGRTMAX should not be exposed (the kernel does not support > the functionality). > 2. I guess the bsd_signal is ok, but I don't like it :-) > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/bsd_signal.html > 3. The pthread_condattr_getclock() prototype is wrong: > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/pthread_condattr_getclock.html > 4. pthread_barrierattr_{get,set}pshared. I am ambivalent about that one > because > I am afraid programs might discover it and think erroneously that we > support > it. Let's wait on that. > 5. _SC_SEM_NSEMS_MAX, although that's not the real limit, good enough. > > So let's not do 1, lets do 2, 5, fix 3 and wait for 4 until we understand > it better. > > christos >
