On May 8, 10:37pm, k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) wrote: -- Subject: Re: ${LINENO} implementation change for /bin/sh
| Yes, but (once I look at doing it, if it is reasonable to implement) | making "local LINENO" in the function cause local line numbering instead. | | The alternative would be an option set before the function is defined | (which I have implemented already, and works). | | Of we could have both, perhaps (the option is really cheap, don't know | about the other yet.) | | Or of course, we can just pick one way (like everyone else does - though | they haven't all picked the same way) and do that all the time. Or another variable, like FUNCLINENO, so you can have both at the same time :-) christos