On Mon 25 Jun 2018 at 01:58:25 +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 19:09:58 +0200 > From: Rhialto <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > | Are we to assume that NetBSD's sh(1) manual page is correct? > > Well, yes and no... > > | Since that clearly says that your example above should not match. > > Actually, it doesn't - it just kind of slides by this case... That is, it > makes no mention of what happens if characters inside [ ] are > quoted (partly because I don't much like the quoting solution, > and never thought the ordering method was hard to get right...)
Well, I don't entirely agree. The description of patterns starts with
(sh(1) from NetBSD-7)
Shell Patterns
A pattern consists of normal characters, which match themselves, and
meta-characters. The meta-characters are ``!'', ``*'', ``?'', and ``[''.
These characters lose their special meanings if they are quoted. When
so I would conclude that '-' cannot lose its meaning if quoted, since it
is not a meta-character.
Added to that, that it gives some other way to include a literal '-' in
a character class, reinforces the impression that [a\-z] does not have a
quoted '-' in it. So while it doesn't explicitly say it, it leaves
little room for a different interpretation.
(All this of course apart from how things actually worked; and I
actually never realised that they didn't work like I interpret the text
here)
> The man page shouild probably be fixed to be more precise - there
> are all kinds of details it omits.
Definitely!
> kre
-Olaf.
--
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- Wayland: Those who don't understand X
\X/ rhialto/at/falu.nl -- are condemned to reinvent it. Poorly.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
