On Dec 15, 7:46pm, [email protected] wrote:
} On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 01:45:04PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
} > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 21:28:34 -0800
} > From: John Nemeth <[email protected]>
} > Message-ID: <[email protected]>
} >
} > | As kre noted, it is probably the oldest network application
} > | around. According to Wikipedia, the protocol was developed in
} > | 1969, predating TCP/IP, which means that it is probably the oldest
} > | TCP/IP application there is.
} >
} > That's actually what I meant. I have no idea in which order the BSD
} > applications were written (nor, for that matter, their original origins.)
} >
} > But if there are bugs in any of them (and that is not impossible, just as
} > with any other software) then we should simply fix them, not just declare
} > some apps as "too old, abandon it".
} >
} > I also simply cannot believe that any issue that might exist in telnet is
} > going to be any worse than firefox with a http:// URL ... and I do not see
} > anyone suggesting that firefox (and every other browser) should be
} > abandoned.
}
} A basic telnet client in python (taking into account the library it uses
} as well) is 800 lines.
} the netbsd telnet client is 16000 lines, taking into account libtelnet.
This tells me that the python one likely doesn't speak the
telnet protocol and therefore isn't a telnet client at all.
} I literally deleted more lines of telnet than it takes to implement a
} new line by unifdef'ing dead code.
}
} Hope that gives you an indication for how great our code is.
These statements tell me absolutely nothing.
}-- End of excerpt from [email protected]
