> Is [#! taking a relative interpreter path] intentional? > What's more, the relative interpreter filename is taken relative to > the current directory, not relative to the script directory.
That's exactly what I'd expect, and what I'd say should happen: it's consistent with ~every other use of relative pathnames. > There's probably some logic to this but it seems bug-prone and I > can't think of a legitimate use for it. I can't offhand either, but I also don't see any real risk from it, and am very far from certain there is no clever use for it. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
