> Actually, replace that last patch with this one. The previous one > wouldn't work if begin and end were the same value (intending to get > just one output value) - though why anyone would write the args that > way instead of just saying 1 reps begin at ... I cannot imagine.
Perhaps because the values weren't hand-specified but came from
somewhere automated in a script? It's a bit like saying "why would
anyone run `cat /dev/null'".
Mouse
