On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:52:11PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote: > So it might be worthwhile to pull up the change _without_ a major bump > even though that technically violates the rules.
Sounds OK, but obvious alternative: do not pull up at all. > On the third hand, I put this off until after 10.1, so maybe it's a > moot point and I should just bump the major (and recursively bump the > major of all dependent libraries). For -current that seems like a good idea. Martin
