dol@ с iPad

> 15 дек. 2015 г., в 19:08, Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> написал(а):
> 
> Basil:
> 
>>> At the moment, what I have is software and conventional memory, and
>>> unless somebody tells me otherwise, I assume that's what we're to be
>>> using for the bridge board implementation.  Are we expecting to do
>>> better than this on the Alpha board?
>> 
>> Cannot exactly say on which stage of the project, but the proper handling of 
>> private keys have to be arranged to consider system fully functional. This 
>> means, in particular, ensuring that during software execution should be no 
>> place (in memory or registers) where private key as a whole will be stored 
>> even for some time.
> 
> Nice idea, but my experience is that it does not work out so simply.  The 
> function to wrap a private key for backup needs to whole plaintext key.  You 
> can wipe the buffer as soon as practical, but there is a small period of time 
> where the whole thing is in memory or registers.
I said nothing about "simply". ;)
Wrapping function accepts just some bit sequence, which is not necessarily 
"whole plaintext key". ;) 
> Russ
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@cryptech.is
https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech

Reply via email to