On 1/29/2016 9:50 PM, Bernd Paysan wrote:
Am Freitag, 29. Januar 2016, 10:04:44 schrieb Russ Housley:
https://fcw.com/articles/2016/01/28/crypto-nist-generator.aspx
Given that SHA-3 is a NiST-based standard, and Keccak offers a combination of
conditioner and DRBG expander as a single building block, it's a bit strange
that it wasn't added into the recommendation. Just Dual_EC_DRBG was
dropped...
Does that mean the NSA does not like using Keccak in this mode?
NIST does allow Keccak as a conditioning component in the draft (line
575, FIPS 202)
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@cryptech.is
https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech
