dol@ с iPad

> 2 мая 2016 г., в 16:26, Pavel Shatov <meisterpa...@yandex.ru> написал(а):
> 
> 02.05.2016 10:43, Fredrik Thulin пишет:
>> On Monday, May 02, 2016 12:37:50 AM Paul Selkirk wrote: ...
>>> The AVR has to do approximately the following: - receive a tamper
>>> interrupt from an external circuit (currently a panic button) -
>>> wipe the MKM - raise an interrupt on the ARM, so it can do whatever
>>> it needs to do - light an LED (red, of course)
>>> 
>>> If we get that right, we might never have to upgrade the AVR.
>> 
>> I agree. I would consider it nice to have (or harmful =) ) to have a
>> software upgrade path for the AVR before Berlin. We could absolutely
>> make a way to transfer firmware to the AVR from the FPGA using
>> GPIOs, but with close to zero benefit at this stage.
> 
> I think, some people will even object to DFU option being present for the 
> tamper detection block. What if malicious user crafts dummy tamper detection 
> firmware, that only lights the red panic LED, but skips actual wiping of the 
> secret key?
> 
Agree... It is really dangerous to implement this I pen hurry and without real 
understanding attack vectors. 
>> My reasoning:
>> 
>> The whole tamper circuitry is currently a development module. It is
>> nice to have a way to erase any keys in the device when re-purposing
>> it or similar, but it currently requires pressing a button on the
>> bottom side of the PCB. If someone wants to actually add tamper
>> protection to the Alpha using the AVR GPIOs, it is not unreasonable
>> to expect them to program the AVR using an ISP programmer connected
>> to the programming header.
> 
> I agree that if someone wants to customize the tamper detection block, he 
> will most probably know how to deal with the hardware part (add new sensors 
> to board, support them in the tamper detection firmware, etc), so he will 
> definitely have AVR programming cable and won't need the DFU option.
> 
>> 
>> So the main reason to make DFU for the AVR I can see would be to
>> streamline manufacturing, and I think we have other things to focus
>> on first.
>> 
>> /Fredrik
> 
> 
> -- 
> With best regards,
> Pavel Shatov
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech@cryptech.is
> https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@cryptech.is
https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech

Reply via email to