Not only was I not careful in writing the orginal, but I can't seem to get
my .sig in the right place either! Blarg! I blame Outlook (which I'm
currently in the process of replacing with exim+mutt. Yay!)
Timm Murray
--------------------
Life is like a perl script: Really short and messy.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Timm Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-tech] Updating Data, given broadcasting
>
>
>
> Timm Murray
> --------------------
>
> Life is like a perl script: Really short and messy.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mr.Bad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 11:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [freenet-tech] Updating Data, given broadcasting
>
>
> > >>>>> "TM" == Timm Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > TM> True updating is most certainly worth it. DBRs are a hack,
> > TM> nothing more. They lack the ability to propagate themselves
> > TM> to every node in Freenet.
> >
> > But they're not supposed to BE on every node in Freenet.
>
>
> I wasn't careful when I wrote that. I ment on every node the orginal data
> is already on. Sorry.
>
>
> Timm Murray
> --------------------
>
> Life is like a perl script: Really short and messy.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freenet-tech mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
>
_______________________________________________
freenet-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
