> > Yes you are wrong. > > 10,000,000 nodes in freenet. > > Depth of search tree (log(n)) ~ 7/8 > > 10ms delay for each node (this is actually low.) > > 70ms. > > > Even assuming 250ms per node, this is still only 2 seconds. This is interesting. What is the size of the net now? Is the net already as large as e^30 ~ 10^10? How come when we click the Snarfoo site, it takes 30sec to several minutes to get a response? _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
- [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Sukru Tikves
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Sukru Tikves
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... coderman
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Sukru Tikves
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability..... Sukru Tikves
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... tech
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Sukru Tikves
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... coderman
- Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Michael Rogers
- Re:Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Timm Murray
- Re:Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Sukru Tikves
- Re:Re: [freenet-tech] freenet vulnurability... Timm Murray
