[ Would you _please_ wrap your lines? ]
Timm Murray:
> > >To understand Freenet, do three things: ignore the developers,
> > >ignore the code, read the papers.
>
> Since the papers are likely to be written by developers, aren't
> points 1 and 3 mutualy exclusive? Or maybe Mark was just trying to
> get newbies to leave him alone.
No. The developers' discussions may be uselessly speculative,
irrelevant, or both. And that's on the good days, when nobody
mentions XML-RPC or Windows installers.
(It's possible to read the devl list for months and still not
understand why abolishing the DataSource field in data messages
would be a bad idea.)
Adam Langley's chapter of the p2p book is concise. There's
apparently a copy in Freenet 0.4:
freenet:CHK@Oy9IfV7HvuqbVVo-ww8TxUhXDjkPAwI,w3G6rrNj1VKk9PHxtHU2Ug
_______________________________________________
freenet-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
