On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:42:03PM +0100, Maarten Geurts wrote: > a reply to :From: Goran Thyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at > 02:38:17PM +0100, Maarten Geurts wrote: > > > -Does any node expect to be connectable to any node, or just a n number > > of nodes it found during the discovery of other nodes. > > - Any node if possible. > > please explain "if possible".
if reachable (within timeout) > Ok, I want to solve this with an other (an desgin of) transport type. > "proxy/firewall.". best thing would be if i only have to change The > connecting node and not do anything of tunneling. However in the protocol > there has something to be changed that only the firewalled node can initiate > the connection. > > Timing out should be prevented since we know from the start it is firewalled > and it makes no sence to try a conventional connect to this node if it has a > non routable adress (10.* /192.168.*) It did some investigations around this topic, and describe what I thought was needed for an implementation. see: http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2001-December/009726.html > I think the tunneling function should be a part of the final protocol. Me too. I just started too mess around with gcj compilation instead because I think the resource demands a JVMs is a bigger problem. happy hacking, -- G�ran Thyni _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
