[I'm cc:'ing this to the freenet-tech and anonnet mailing lists] Hi,
If I recall right, you've mentioned a plan of hooking up AnonNet and Freenet together, so as to provide a stronger anonimity scheme for both publisher and consumer. As I understand from discussions on the Freenet mailing lists, they think Freenet is particularily good at providing plausible deniability for the data storers, but there doesn't seem to be a consensus on the degree of anonimity for consumer (ie. requester) and document publisher (ie. insertor). How did you forsee linking both together? Would it be as easy as having nodes running both servers on different ports? And what are your thoughts on the added degree of anonimity it would offer? Please have a look at the concerning thread on freenet-tech ([freenet-tech] improving anonimity through pipenet frontend) for more thoughts. We could help in setting up tests, but we need guidance ;-) --nico --* William Ahern (Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 05:45:01PM -0800) *-- > hello, > > i'm developing an anonymity application over at > http://www.authnet.org/anonnet/. it uses the pipenet > model, which roughly is a series of tunneled proxies. -- nico galoppo - tremelo/leuven, belgium - baalsebaan 163, 3120 tremelo --------------------------------------------------------------- [bash]:~$ man woman nico at crossbar dot net No manual entry for woman debian linux :: vim powered _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
