On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:29:57PM -0800, Adam Megacz wrote: > > Goran Thyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It is more a question of syntax not handled by gcj at the moment. > > What syntax does GCJ not handle?
The big one is that it can't inherited from an public inner class. I filed a bug report PR-5758. (should have check the DB more closly PR-5632 seems to be the same issue) There are some smaller issues too, I will make test cases and file them too. > I personally don't use GCJ for debugging -- I get my code 100% > working/debugged/tested under HotSpot, and then recompile with GCJ for > deployment. VM's and interpreters will probably always provide a > better debugging environment than static compilers. Hmm, of course but freenet works on JDK/Jikes/Kaffe. When I hack the code to get it to compile with gcj it doesn't work as good. Neither does a binary compiled from JDK generated .class files. Could be my fault, could be subtle falut in the freenet code, could be gcj/libgcj bug. best regards, -- G�ran Thyni _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
