David Allen wrote: > Hello, I'd like to respond to a few points about your searching scheme. I > don't mean to criticize you, but I would like to point out that searching > freenet is a non-trivial thing, and AFAIK nobody has come up with a system > yet that doesn't have rather large drawbacks. ...
I have mentioned Alpine here once before ( http://cubicmetercrystal.com/alpine/ ) It may be of interest. I am at a point where integration with third party transport networks is possible now that the core development is winding down. I would probably need a c++ Freenet library implementation, however, this would be usefull for other purposes as well (resume white rose?) Regards, Martin Peck -- _____________________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cubicmetercrystal.com/ key fingerprint: 9C00 C63E A71D D488 AF17 F406 56FB 71D9 E17D E793 ( see html source for public key ) --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
